Showing posts with label Genetic Alliance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genetic Alliance. Show all posts

Monday, October 19, 2009

Do You Know Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency?

Let me confess this upfront. Until I met John Walsh at the 2008 Genetic Alliance conference, I was not familiar with the genetic disorder called Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD). John is one of the founders and President of AlphaNet. Since then I have learned that AATD, a genetic mutation, reduces the levels of a protective protein in the bloodstream. AAT deficiency can lead to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), specifically emphysema, and liver disease.

John had attended a presentation I gave on improving the use of family health history and genetic/genomic data in the electronic health record. Later I was both surprised and honored when he invited me to become a member the AlphaNet board of directors. So when I saw that Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency was added in April of this year to my 23andMe Carrier Status report, I thought the timing was providential.


Click image to enlarge

As I have new opportunities to met people with Alpha-1, they would always ask if I have been tested to see if have the mutation. I hadn’t until the 23andMe result appeared. The test most people take is a simple finger-stick test for blood. But you can also get tested by genotyping, which is how I learned of my AAT deficiency carrier status.

23andMe told me that an estimated one out of every 5,000 - 7,000 North Americans has AAT deficiency. Interestingly, in Scandinavia the numbers are higher. One in every 1,500 to 3,000 people there is affected. These numbers go higher when you take into account the people who have AAT deficiency, but have not been diagnosed.


Click on image to enlarge

The main versions of the gene that encodes AATD are PI*M (the normal version), PI*S, and PI*Z. A person inherits a copy of the gene from each parent, producing six possible combinations: MM, MS, MZ, SS, SZ, and ZZ. Something I learned from 23andme - In addition to the PI*M, PI*S, and PI*Z versions of the gene for AAT, there are more than 20 known rare mutations that can lead to AAT deficiency.

The PI*Z form of the gene is the most severe mutation; the ZZ genotype accounts for 95% of AAT deficiency. People with the SZ genotype are at an increased risk for COPD, particularly if they smoke. The MZ genotype causes only mild reduction in AAT protein levels, but may lead to decreased lung function in smokers.

Difficult Diagnosis

The AlphaNet website tells us that Alpha-1 patients experience difficulty and delay in getting properly diagnosed. Clinical research studies have shown that once a patient develops symptoms, it takes an average of seven years and visits to five different doctors before the diagnosis of Alpha-1 is correctly made. I have met Alpha’s that confirm this. Many non-smoking Alpha’s are of accused of smoking by their doctor. About 3% of all people diagnosed with COPD may have undetected Alpha-1.

For treatment of lung disease caused by AAT deficiency, intravenous alpha-1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy, annual flu vaccination and a pneumococcal vaccine every 5 years are recommended. Relief of breathlessness may be obtained with long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids. Both end-stage lung and liver disease can be treated by organ transplantation. In AATD patients with cirrhosis of the liver, the prognosis is generally grave.

The AlphaNet Community

I began working with AlphaNet a year ago. I learned that one of the many things AlphaNet does is provide disease care coordinators for more than 7,000 people with Alpha-1. Their website further explains that “AlphaNet Coordinators are spread across the United States and subscribers to AlphaNet are assigned to a specific AlphaNet Coordinator based upon geographical location. Each AlphaNet subscriber is contacted at least monthly by his or her AlphaNet Coordinator. The AlphaNet Coordinator provides support, education and assistance with augmentation therapy infusion issues and supplies.” Since 1997, AlphaNet has donated $25 million to the Alpha-1 Foundation, which performs research to cure AAT deficiency.

More information I learn from 23andMe includes -

· Not everyone with AAT deficiency will have symptoms, leading some researchers to suggest that additional genetic factors other than mutations in the gene that encodes AAT may be involved.
· Between 15% and 19% of adults with AAT deficiency develops cirrhosis of the liver after age 50.
· The donor liver following liver transplantation will make normal AAT protein and actually cure the deficiency in the rest of the body.


Click on image to enlarge

Family History

A paper on Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency was published this summer in the New England Journal of Medicine. One of the authors, Dr. Robert A. Sandhaus, is also a board member and Medical Director of AlphaNet. The article states that “AAT deficiency is recognized in less than 10% of persons in whom a diagnosis would be expected on the basis of screening studies in the general population. The diagnosis of AAT deficiency is generally made after the identification of COPD or liver disease or after the deficiency has been diagnosed in a family member”.

The authors recommend that a family testing discussion be held in the initial evaluation of the newly diagnosed patient. A diagnosis of Alpha-1 could impact family including brothers, sisters, children, grandchildren, and possibly extended family members.

To assist in finding those who are still undiagnosed, Intermountain Healthcare’s Clinical Genetics Institute is designing a study using an internet-based, patient-entered family health history program. Both the software program and the research study are under development, but we hope to find that computerized family health history tools can be effective screening methods to identify and treat those families that might be at risk for an inherited, familial disease for which they are not aware. The earlier the detection, the less damage the disease will have done.





Perspective from a medical geneticist



Traditional vs. Predisposition Genetic Testing

The two results from testing discussed this month, BRCA and alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), represent much more traditional types of genetic testing than the predisposition testing we’ve written about in most of the posts. In contrast to the BRCA testing which was limited to only three mutations (or the Cystic Fibrosis gene CFTR where only one mutation is tested), the AAT test results report all of the recommended clinically important mutations in this gene. Grant does an excellent job of describing the disease and its implications.

From my perspective, the challenge that hasn’t been adequately met in practice is testing of individuals who are symptomatic. As Grant points out, we are not doing a very good job of identifying the disease in symptomatic individuals. In 2008, Hogarth and Rachelefsky published a review in the journal Chest that looked at testing and screening for AAT deficiency. (reference below) They highlight 4 interventions that could be used if the disease was identified early. These include: smoking prevention/cessation; minimizing the hazards of occupational respiratory pollutants; the opportunities to receive augmentation therapy; and the potential for family planning and guided genetic counseling/testing. Thus we have a situation where we can definitively characterize the results of the mutation testing; we can identify individuals at risk; we can initiate preventive measures in those at risk and start treatment in symptomatic patients. This in some ways represents an ideal genetic test.

Genetic Testing for Symptomatic Patients

While there have been some suggestions that population screening (at least in Caucasians) for AAT mutations would be beneficial, the consensus has been that this approach would be too expensive. In addition, there are many individuals who carry disease causing mutations who never develop symptoms. That said, we’re doing a very poor job testing individuals who are symptomatic, despite professional guidelines supported by strong evidence that recommend testing all individuals with emphysema, COPD, or asthma with airflow obstruction not completely reversible with the use of bronchodilators; all individuals with unexplained liver disease; asymptomatic subjects with persistent obstruction found on pulmonary function test findings and with identifiable risk factors; and adults with necrotizing panniculitis.

Informed Consumers

So it certainly appears that there would be a role for informed consumers to be able to access testing given that health care professionals are not doing an adequate job. Interestingly this has been studied in AAT, including testing of minors. (see references below). These tests seem to be well accepted. Nearly 80% of current smokers indicated that they were highly likely to stop smoking if they were ZZ. Most individuals (but not all) said they would share the results of testing with their physician, however a small number would not want the result placed in their medical record because of concerns about privacy.

The U.S. Center for AIR is performing testing under a research protocol to learn more about the risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer testing for AAT deficiency. This type of research is extremely important to better understand the role of consumer directed genetic testing. Kudos to the groups that are sponsoring this important research. Testing is also available outside of a research protocol through the AAT Deficiency Testing Center. In contrast to 23andMe that provides results, but no other support, AAT testing is sponsored by AAT organizations that can provide support for newly diagnosed patients.

It should be noted that one can also measure the level of alpha 1 antitrypsin activity in the blood stream, obviating the need for a genetic test. So, if you’re interested in being tested for AAT deficiency, probably better to use one of these services than 23andMe. However, if you have been identified as carrying a mutation through the 23andMe testing, contact one of the advocacy organizations for more information. It could save your life!

References:

Hogarth DK, Rachelefsky G. Screening and familial testing of patients for alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 2008 Apr;133(4):981-8

Strange, C, Moseley, MA, Jones, Y, et al Genetic testing of minors for α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160,531-534

Gitter AC, Jones Y, Schwartz L, et al. Confidential home α1-antitrypsin testing: specialty center support for rare diseases. Presented at: the American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting; May 18–23, 2007; San Francisco, CA; poster A988

Strange, C, Dickson, R, Carter, C, et al Genetic testing for alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Genet Med 2004;6,204-210

Monday, June 1, 2009

What is this all about?

Germany recently passed a new law significantly limiting the use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests, which can only be carried out by a licensed doctor following the patient’s consent. In response, the UK–based PHG Foundation, an independent not-for-profit public health organization focusing on genome-based science and technologies to improve health, calls this law “a regressive and paternalistic approach that takes genetic exceptionalism to an extreme not seen in other jurisdictions”.

Because similar debates are still raging in the US, we decided to explore both sides of the issue. Grant Wood will openly share his results from a DTC genetic service. Dr. Marc Williams will give advice as a medical geneticist and Janet Williams as a genetic counselor. Both will guide Grant through any potential misinterpretations.


Influences on my decision

Hi. My name is Grant Wood. I work in the field of medical genetics and I consider myself very lucky in that I have a fascinating job. Genetics touches all of us, yet we are still at the point where it has this ring of mystique and futurism to it. In many ways we view genetics as future science; our individual and collective medical future. Genetics is still a relatively new field within healthcare, yet when I tell people about my work, they all want to share stories about a genetic-related condition that has affected them and their families.

My work involves building new computer programs that can help doctors and patients collect, track, understand, and use family health history and genetic/genomic information in patient care. Therefore I felt it made perfect sense that I should explore how technology – both gene chips (or DNA microarrays) and the Internet – could combine to give me access as never before to my own biology.

Then another serendipitous event happened. While participating with the 2008 Genetic Alliance conference, I spent a day with Linda Avey, co-founder of one of these new personal genomics companies called 23andMe, visiting and talking with congressional offices in Washington, DC about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008. I learned that 23andMe provides a service where subscribers can receive personalized genetic reports containing information related to 110 traits and diseases. Order the kit online, spit in the tube, send it in the mail. (More on this in the next post).

Linda Avey is in the center. I am on the far left. We are in the Speaker of the House's office in the Capitol building, Washington, D.C.


I started to think about what my questions and expectations would be if I decided to sign up for the service 23andMe provided. My list contained questions and thoughts like:

• Exactly what kind of information can 23andMe provide me about the 110 traits and diseases my report would cover?
• Would I learn something about myself that I didn’t already know?
• Would I discover information that I should immediately take to my doctor?
• Is genetics really a proven science, and what kind of research is still in progress?
• Would it be important for the information in my report to get added to my Intermountain electronic health record?
• Should I share this kind of information with my family members? What about other interested people?
• What kind of cool technology would 23andMe use to show me my genetic report?

The price for the test was high - $999 per test kit - so I put the option of testing on the backburner. A short time after our meeting however, 23andMe reduced the price of their service to $399. I immediately went online and ordered the kit. My journey was about to begin.




Perspective from a medical geneticist




My First Impressions

I'm Dr. Marc Williams. When the first Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) genome tests were made available to the public, my initial response was this is irresponsible and certainly not ready for use. I had concerns that we didn’t have much evidence for the significance of many of the results that were to be reported; we had little information about the accuracy of the testing itself and we didn’t know how to use the information to make recommendations to improve health. In addition people may find out things that they really didn’t want to know as part of the testing (such as finding they carry a mutation in one of the BRCA genes meaning increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer) without access to genetic counseling or that they may pursue expensive investigations based on a finding from testing (as has been seen with whole-body CT scans) that would stress an already overtaxed health care system. These concerns reflect those raised by the American College of Medical Genetics’ statement on DTC genetic testing.

As I reflected more on this I realized that my initial reaction was in many ways a stereotypical “doctor” response. How dare a patient take medical care into their own hands? In reality we are asking, nay encouraging, patients to take more and more responsibility for their own health and heath decisions. It is hypocritical to encourage patients to take responsibility on one hand and criticize them for doing so on the other. While DTC testing may not be a choice I would make as a patient, I must be willing to accept that others have a different perspective. Consider the example of alternative medicines such as herbal preparations. For a long time physicians scoffed at their usefulness and criticized patients who used them. Ultimately we harmed patients as they would not admit to using alternative medicines to us, rightly fearing criticism, leading to adverse reactions due to interactions with prescription drugs. In addition there is emerging evidence that at least some preparations may be beneficial for certain conditions.

If I am open to a patient telling me about the results of their DTC test it allows me to understand what they are concerned about and why. This may provide a teachable moment that will allow the patient to take action to make positive changes in their life. This approach, while not necessarily ‘scientific’ or ‘evidence-based’ reflects our Healing Connections at Intermountain Healthcare, in particular: I listen to you with sensitivity and respond to your needs; and, I treat you with respect and compassion.

I look forward to exploring with Grant his journey through his DTC genetic test results. I’m convinced that if I really listen to what Grant has to say, I may learn more from him, than he will learn medically from me. We hope this series will be entertaining and thought-provoking.

Read the next post - Reading about Consents, Risks, and Privacy - Now the Fun Starts